overig

Implementation Capacity

19 December 2023
Teasertekst
How can the government reinforce the implementation capacity needed to put into practice (in good time) the proposed policy for tackling the major challenges within the living environment, and what factors impede or promote this?

Background and request for advice
 

The Netherlands is facing major challenges in the living environment. Those challenges concern housing, accessibility, water, nature, biodiversity, climate, raw materials, the energy supply, or hazardous substances. For all these challenges the tasks involved are immense and urgent. The term "crisis" is often used. These challenges have sometimes been ongoing for decades. Although progress is being made in a large number of areas, it is often uncertain whether the targets can be achieved in good time. The Dutch government has therefore formulated additional policies in many areas.

There is growing concern both within and beyond government as to whether public authorities and their implementing organisations – together with businesses, civil-society organisations, and the general public – will succeed in implementing all the policy plans. Will we be able to organise enough "implementation capacity" together?

The main question addressed in this advisory report is “How can the government reinforce the implementation capacity needed to put into practice (in good time) the proposed policy for tackling the major challenges within the living environment, and what factors impede or promote this?”

This (unsolicited) advisory report supplements our work programme for 2023-2024.

Construction of wind turbines in a spacious landscape

Action plan
 

The advisory project comprises three phases.

In the first phase, we focus on ten specific case studies. In ten round tables we discuss with professionals involved in the work of implementation what factors impede or promote policy implementation in practice. This phase produces an overview of aspects that are important for successfully implementing policy on the living environment.

The second phase involves in-depth analysis of five aspects of implementation. Together with experts, we analyse how impeding factors can be eliminated in actual practice, and what best practices are more widely applicable.

In the third phase, the Council sets out its main insights based on the material collected and presents recommendations for how the government can reinforce implementation capacity.

In drawing up this advisory report, the Council is supported by advisors of the BMC consultancy firm. They have taken responsibility for organising round tables and expert meetings during the first two phases, and for writing the case and aspect reports that will appear as a result.

No Council advisory committee was convened for the initial phases of the advisory project.

Timeframe

Publication date: 19 December 2023

Composition of the council committee

Jeanet van Antwerpen, Council member Rli and committee chair
Karin Sluis, Council member Rli
Joris van den Boom, Junior Council member Rli

External committee members:
Evelien van Everdingen, Director at Prolander
Martijn van der Steen, Associate Dean and Deputy-director at NSOB and Professor at Erasmus University Rotterdam

Information or response

For more information about the advisory report or to comment, please contact the project leader, Tim Zwanikken at, uitvoeringskracht@rli.nl  or +31 (0)6 5287 4404.

sitecontent

Work Programme for 2024-2025 adopted

The Minister of Infrastructure and Water Management (IenW), Mark Harbers, submitted the Council's Work Programme for 2024-2025 to the Dutch House of Representatives on 20 December 2023, doing so also on behalf of the Ministers of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (BZK), Economic Affairs and Climate (EZK), Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (LNV), and Climate and Energy, and the State Secretaries for IenW and Kingdom Relations and Digitalisation (K&D). The work programme outlines the advisory topics, the latest status, and the schedule going forward.

illustration of cogwheels that interlock with drawings of agriculture, infrastructure, housing, consultation, transport, energy

Themes for advice

The following three advisory processes from the 2023-2024 work programme will continue into 2024:

  • Long-term spatial consequences of climate adaptation
  • Juridification of the social debate on sustainability and the environment
  • Overall well-being in environmental policy practice

The “sustainable construction” advisory process from the 2023–2024 work programme is expected to be launched in early 2024. The Council expects to issue its unsolicited advisory report on “System failures in policy on the living environment” in mid-2024 (it published an exploratory study of this problem in December 2023). Finally, at the request of the Ministers of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (BZK), Infrastructure and Water Management (IenW), and Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (LNV), the Council is currently preparing an advisory report on “the national approach to foundation problems”. This report will be delivered by no later than 1 March 2024, as per the request for advice.

The five new advisory reports that the Council will deal with in the work programme are:

  1. How can we comply with the Montreal Pledge?
  2. Main Energy Structure
  3. Future-proof drinking water supply
  4. Inclusive sustainability
  5. Working for a sustainable living environment through government shareholdings

The Council also plans to organise a conference in mid-2024, on the occasion of the appointment of new Council members. The title of the conference will be:

6. The Netherlands after remodelling, conference

se the issues regarding the living environment that are addressed in our advisory reports are also relevant (or may be) to the Caribbean Netherlands, the Council will launch a preliminary study in early 2024 on how to include that part of the Kingdom in policy on the living environment.

In addition to the above topics, the Council will in the coming years supplement its regular work with advice based on the interim and final outcomes of evaluation of the Environment and Planning Act. For this purpose, the Council has been temporarily supplemented by two Council members who are also members of the Environment and Planning Act Evaluation Committee. Arrangements will be made with the Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations on the programming of these advisory reports and the questions to be addressed.

Read the 2024–2025 work programme 

For more information, contact Ron Hillebrand, General Secretary, at ron.hillebrand@rli.nl or on 06 2180 0302

 

sitecontent

Advisory council calls on Dutch government to pay greater attention to implementation of policy for the living environment

Implementation of policy for the living environment is lagging behind, meaning that urgent problems are not being solved. The Council for the Environment and Infrastructure (Rli) therefore calls on the Dutch government to strike a much better balance between policy development and policy implementation in actual practice. The Rli does so in its advisory report on “Bridging the Implementation Gap”, which was published on 19 December.

Place policy and implementation on an equal footing

The world of policy in the seat of governement systematically pays too little attention to the actual implementation of policy in practice. As a result, challenges facing the Netherlands in its physical living environment, such as building large numbers of homes, are being insufficiently implemented. The Rli advocates making far better use of insights derived from actual implementation when drawing up policy measures.

sitecontent
Raad
Adviesrelatie

Rli publishes advisory report on “Bridging the Implementation Gap: Tackling Factors Impeding Policy for the Physical Living Environment”

Implementation of policy for the living environment is lagging behind, meaning that urgent problems are not being solved. The Council for the Environment and Infrastructure (Rli) therefore calls on the Dutch government to strike a much better balance between policy development and policy implementation in actual practice. The Rli does so in its advisory report on “Bridging the Implementation Gap”, which was published on 19 December.

Photo: Cover of the advisory report

The world of policy in the seat of government systematically pays too little attention to the actual implementation of policy in practice. As a result, objectives facing the Netherlands in its physical living environment, such as building large numbers of homes, are being insufficiently implemented. The Rli advocates placing policy and implementation on an equal footing and making far better use of insights derived from actual implementation when drawing up policy measures. Placing policy and implementation on an equal footing and actually implementing policy plans will contribute to public trust in government.

Give implementing parties a permanent role in policy development

Implementing parties must be able to indicate in good time whether policy is actually implementable. Central government implementing organisations can do this if they are involved, as standard, in consultations between top-level civil servants at all Dutch ministries; that is by no means always the case at present. The Rli also envisions an important role for the Secretary-General (SG) of each policy department, who should ensure that other parties that contribute to implementation are also involved in policy development at an early stage. 

Furthermore, the Rli calls for attention to be paid to municipalities, provinces, and water boards that have to carry out a large number of central government objectives. They must not be assigned implementation objectives without sufficient funding. The Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations should ensure that that does not happen. Given that many such objectives need to be successfully tackled in the various regions of the country, it is important for the Minister to enhance administrative cooperation at regional level. 

Professionalise how implementation is organised

Implementation often fails to get off the ground because it is unclear who exactly should make the substantive decisions and allocate the relevant budgets. It is crucial that policy-makers and implementers make clear arrangements for this, on an issue-by-issue basis.

Arrangements are needed regarding the culture of cooperation. Trust and transparency need to be at the heart of this, so that dilemmas, doubts, and uncertainties can be raised for discussion unhindered. It is important for parties to feel confident enough – even when the situation becomes tense – to seek solutions and take difficult decisions.

Adopt a smart approach to dealing with the scarcity of human resources

For the present, the scarcity of human resources is structural and unavoidable. A smarter approach is therefore needed when dealing with it. Creating a pool of experts and sharing know-how and specialists (regionally) can provide a solution. A lot of work can also be standardised, so that there is no need to constantly reinvent the wheel everywhere. 

Read the press release “Advisory council calls on Dutch government to pay greater attention to implementation of policy for the living environment” 

Read more about the advisory report on “Bridging the Implementation Gap: Tackling Factors Impeding Policy for the Physical Living Environment” 

For more information about the advisory report, please contact the project leader Tim Zwanikken at uitvoeringskracht@rli.nl  or on +31 (0)6 5287 4404.

sitecontent

Focusing on wellbeing in environmental policy practice

Expected after the summer of 2024
Teasertekst
How can central government ensure that its decision-making focuses in a targeted way on maintaining and enhancing ‘wellbeing’, with particular consideration for the domain of the living environment?

Background and request for advice
 

In recent years, central government, provinces and municipalities have often stated that their policies are aimed at achieving wellbeing. The term ‘wellbeing’ expresses the idea that quality of life is about more than just money, material goods and services; it is also, for example, about the way we live together, the quality of the environment and how wellbeing is distributed.

There is a risk that this term conceals the fact that there are complexities, differing views of society and conflicting interests at play. Another risk is that the term is used to present ideas or concrete proposals as ‘good, because they contribute to wellbeing’, without making the underlying views or any additional negative consequences explicit. As a result, wellbeing becomes a fashionable concept with which we all identify but in which we also see confirmation of our own positions.

In this advisory project the Council will identify different ways in which we talk about and reflect on wellbeing and, in each case, will pinpoint what we are already doing well and what still needs to be done. It will also analyse the underlying values that are involved when it comes to policymaking and what importance is attached to them (by various actors).

Finally, the Council will look at how wellbeing is playing a role in decision-making and what is working well and less well. Here we are talking about the knowledge and information needed about aspects of wellbeing and their interrelationships, the preconditions that apply and the procedures involved in reaching decisions. The direction given during the implementation and realisation of projects and policies may also be covered here.

Based on these analyses, the Council will identify the main problem areas and offer the next government guidance on how to focus policy efforts on wellbeing, with particular consideration for the domain of the living environment.

The main question addressed in the report is:

"How can central government ensure that decision-making focuses in a targeted way on maintaining and enhancing wellbeing, i.e. taking into account economic, social and environmental aspects, current and future generations, impacts in other parts of the world and the distribution between groups of citizens? How can focusing policy efforts on wellbeing be made practically manageable for different applications and in different situations? And how can we ensure consistency in this process?"

children playing in sand

Timeframe
 

The advisory report is expected to be issued after the summer of 2024.

Composition of the Council committee

Pallas Agterberg, Rli Council Member and chair of the committee
Jeroen Niemans, Rli Council Member
Erik Verhoef, Rli Council Member

External committee members:

Aniek Moonen, former chair of the Youth Climate Movement and co-chair of the Board of Trustees of WECF
Maarten van Poelgeest, partner at consultancy firm AEF

Information or response

To comment or for more information, please contact the project leader, Douwe Wielenga, at douwe.wielenga@rli.nl, or on +31 (0)6 2124 0809

sitecontent

National approach to foundation problems

Published on the 29th of February 2024
Teasertekst
An advisory report for the new Dutch cabinet on how to establish – together with all stakeholders (public authorities, civil-society organisations, market players, and the public) – a feasible and just national approach to tackling the problem of foundation damage.

Background and request for advice
 

On 9 October 2023, the caretaker Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations requested the Council to issue an advisory opinion in the near future on a national approach to tackling the problem of foundation damage (including as a result of land subsidence and climate change). This request was also made on behalf of the caretaker Minister of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality and the caretaker Minister of Infrastructure and Water Management.

The problem of foundation damage affects large parts of the Netherlands. Exact figures are not yet available, but potentially 500,000 to more than 1 million homes may be affected, in both urban and rural areas. The problem has a major impact on those affected. Examples of the problem include the canal between Almelo and De Haandrik, the Friesian peatland meadow areas, and buildings in such cities as Dordrecht, Gouda, and Zaanstad.

Briefly, the request for advice involves the following three components:

  1. Based on available national and international research, identify the nature and extent of foundation problems in the Netherlands, and how these problems may develop in the coming decades due to land subsidence and climate change.
  2. Draw up an analysis of the weaknesses and gaps in the current approach to the issue, including what social, physical and economic risks may arise if building owners and other stakeholders are too late or insufficiently decisive in dealing with land subsidence and foundation damage.
  3. Make recommendations as to how best to organise a national approach to foundation damage that is feasible and fair.

The Council believes that in responding to the request for advice, it is important to consider both the technical aspects and the perceptions and experience of residents, business owners, and other stakeholders.

Photo with man measuring foundation of a house

Timeframe
 

The advisory report is published on the 29th of February 2024.

Composition of the Council committee

The advisory report will be drawn up by a committee consisting of:

Jantine Kriens, Rli Council Member and chair of the committee

Niels Koeman, Rli Council Member

Krijn Poppe, Rli Council Member

Yourai Mol, Rli junior Council Member

 

External committee members:

Annemieke Nijhof, Director of Deltares, whose previous positions include Rli Council Member, DG for Water at the (former) Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, Council Advisor at the Ministry of General Affairs, and Deputy Director of External Safety at the (former) Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment. Among other positions, she is also a member of the Advisory Board of the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) and a government-appointed Supervisory Director of the Dutch Central Bank (DNB).

Bernard ter Haar, former DG for Social Security and Director of Financial Markets and Deputy Treasurer-General at the Ministry of Finance, as well as a former consultant at ABDTOPConsult, and chairman of the Energy System Expert Team 2050.

Information or response

For more information or to respond, please contact Joris Stok (acting project leader) at joris.stok@rli.nl or on 06 1324 6502.

sitecontent

Rli starts preparing advisory report on a national approach to foundation problems

The problem of foundation damage affects large parts of the Netherlands. Exact figures are not yet available, but potentially 500,000 to more than 1 million homes may be affected, in both urban and rural areas. The problem has a major impact on those affected.
 

On 9 October 2023, the caretaker Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations requested the Council to issue an advisory opinion in the near future on a national approach to tackling the problem of foundation damage (including as a result of land subsidence and climate change). This request was also made on behalf of the caretaker Minister of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality and the caretaker Minister of Infrastructure and Water Management.

Person measuring the foundation of a house

An advisory report for the new Dutch cabinet on how to establish – together with all stakeholders (public authorities, civil-society organisations, market players, and the public) – a feasible and just national approach to tackling the problem of foundation damage.
 

The Council expects to publish its report in the spring of 2024.

Read more about the advisory report on a national approach to foundation problems

For more information about the advisory report, please contact Joris Stok (acting project leader) at joris.stok@rli.nl or on 06 1324 6502

sitecontent

Rli releases advisory report Phasing Out the Throw-away Society on Black Friday

The Council for the Environment and Infrastructure (Rli) calls on the Dutch government to put a stop to the ‘throw-away society’. More and more products end up as waste after only a short time. This is at the expense of working conditions, the climate, and the environment. The Council states this in its advisory report Phasing Out the Throw-away Society, which it presented to the State Secretary for Infrastructure and Water Management, Vivianne Heijnen, the day before Black Friday.

Photo of the presentation of the advisory report

The production of clothing, furniture, and consumer electronics involves cutting costs to the maximum extent possible, thus also cutting down on quality. The result is products that don’t last very long. The negative effects involved are also not factored into the price. If we want to make our economy sustainable, this must be stopped.

Consumers are enticed to buy, and to quickly throw away 

A low price and low quality of clothes, for example, leads to them being thrown away; this is referred to as ‘fast fashion’. But ‘fast furniture’ and single-use electronics are also booming. Consumers lack the necessary information for making deliberate, sustainable choices from the overall range of products available. They are also constantly enticed – for instance by rock-bottom offers – to purchase throw-away products.

Start phasing out the throw-away society right now 

The Rli advocates tackling the problem along several tracks simultaneously. The Dutch government should push within Europe for stringent requirements as regards product sustainability, lifespan, and reparability. Legislation – at both EU and national level – must be introduced leading to ‘truer’ pricing, as well as more information for consumers about the sustainability of products. The Rli also proposes introducing a lifespan and repair label, with information about the expected useful life and reparability of products. Among other things, it also recommends discouraging rock-bottom offers and advertisements for throw-away products. 

Promote repair, reuse, and recycling

The Rli believes that the government should start striving, as soon as possible, for longer product life by promoting repair and reuse. This can be done by ensuring that a fully-fledged second-hand market develops, and that repairing broken products becomes normal and affordable. The first step would be to eliminate the VAT on repairs. Producers, in turn, must be made more responsible for recycling their products at the end of their lifespan. This should be arranged in close consultation with the municipalities, which also have an important role to play in this regard.

Meeting on afternoon of Wednesday 7 February 2024

The Rli will be holding a meeting about its advisory report Phasing Out the Throw-away Society in The Hague on Wednesday afternoon, 7 February 2024. We look forward to discussing the report with you then. Be sure to mark the date in your diary now! We hope you will be able to attend. Further information about the programme and the speakers is in Dutch on the Rli-website.

Read the press release ‘Advisory board: Stop the throw-away society’ 

Read more about the advisory report Phasing Out the Throw-away Society

For more information about the advisory report, please contact the project leader, Bas Waterhout, at bas.waterhout@rli.nl, or on +31 (0)6 21178802.

sitecontent

Advisory board: Stop the throw-away society

More and more products end up as waste after only a short time. The desire to produce and sell as much as possible – for example clothing, furniture, and electronics – leads to low quality and short product lifespans. This is at the expense of working conditions, the climate, and the environment. If we want to make our economy sustainable, this must be stopped. In its advisory report Phasing Out the Throw-Away Society, the Council for the Environment and Infrastructure (Rli) calls on the Dutch government to take the necessary action. The report was presented to the State Secretary for Infrastructure and Water Management, Vivianne Heijnen, the day before Black Friday.

The quality and price of products are too low

The production of clothing, furniture, and consumer electronics involves cutting costs to the maximum extent possible, thus also cutting down on quality. The result is products that don’t last very long. The negative effects involved are also not factored into the price. This leads to depletion of scarce raw materials, and to poor working conditions in, for example, the textile industry in Asia and mining in Africa. It also has negative effects on the climate, biodiversity, and the environment. 

sitecontent
Raad
Adviesrelatie

Rli starts preparing advisory report ‘Focusing on wellbeing in environmental policy practice’

In recent years, central government, provinces and municipalities have often stated that their policies are aimed at achieving wellbeing. The term ‘wellbeing’ expresses the idea that quality of life is about more than just money, material goods and services; it is also, for example, about the way we live together, the quality of the environment and how wellbeing is distributed. 

children playing in sand

How can central government ensure that its decision-making focuses in a targeted way on maintaining and enhancing wellbeing, with particular consideration for the domain of the living environment?
 

The key question in the report is: "How can central government ensure that decision-making focuses in a targeted way on maintaining and enhancing wellbeing, i.e. taking into account economic, social and environmental aspects, current and future generations, impacts in other parts of the world and the distribution between groups of citizens? How can focusing policy efforts on wellbeing be made practically manageable for different applications and in different situations? And how can we ensure consistency in this process?"

In the advisory report the Council will offer the next government guidance on how to focus on wellbeing and will identify the main problem areas.

The Council expects to issue its advisory report in the spring of 2024.

Read more about the advisory report ‘Focusing on wellbeing in environmental policy practice’

To comment or for more information, please contact the project leader, Douwe Wielenga, at douwe.wielenga@rli.nl, or on +31 (0)6 2124 0809

sitecontent